<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Braindump</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.curtis-lamasters.com</link>
	<description>A TechBlog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:29:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Mass Disable the Computer Browser Service by R Noel</title>
		<link>http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/2008/03/28/mass-disable-the-computer-browser-service/comment-page-1/#comment-388</link>
		<dc:creator>R Noel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/index.php/2008/03/28/mass-disable-the-computer-browser-service/#comment-388</guid>
		<description>As a network administrator I found this to be very valueable information.  

THANK YOU for this post.  

RN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a network administrator I found this to be very valueable information.  </p>
<p>THANK YOU for this post.  </p>
<p>RN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Computer &#8211; 5.9 Vista Experience for under $400 by Ubuntu for 30 Days &#171; Braindump</title>
		<link>http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/2008/12/18/new-computer-59-vista-experience-for-under-400/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ubuntu for 30 Days &#171; Braindump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 04:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/?p=198#comment-215</guid>
		<description>[...] Alrighty, I know it&#8217;s been a while and you are all bored or have already deleted my RSS from your reader but hopefully I&#8217;ll peak your interestes a bit.  My goal for the next 30 days is to use Ubuntu 9.04 at home (sorry Windows required at work).  I know this has already been done but as everyone is different, hopefully my experience will differ.  If you have any feedback please let me know.  Just for info, I&#8217;ll be using my new home hardware here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Alrighty, I know it&#8217;s been a while and you are all bored or have already deleted my RSS from your reader but hopefully I&#8217;ll peak your interestes a bit.  My goal for the next 30 days is to use Ubuntu 9.04 at home (sorry Windows required at work).  I know this has already been done but as everyone is different, hopefully my experience will differ.  If you have any feedback please let me know.  Just for info, I&#8217;ll be using my new home hardware here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on dd-wrt &#8211; Cool New Feature &#8211; AncorFree by Iphone Discount Blackberry deal</title>
		<link>http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/2008/06/21/dd-wrt-cool-new-feature-ancorfree/comment-page-1/#comment-201</link>
		<dc:creator>Iphone Discount Blackberry deal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 15:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/?p=89#comment-201</guid>
		<description>I have used this feature. Users have to click the ADS to generate the income. After one year, I earned $15 with an average of 30 unique users everyday. The only people making money is Anchorfree.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used this feature. Users have to click the ADS to generate the income. After one year, I earned $15 with an average of 30 unique users everyday. The only people making money is Anchorfree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows / IIS SSL &#8211; Restrict Weak Ciphers by Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/2008/06/21/windows-iis-ssl-restrict-weak-ciphers/comment-page-1/#comment-193</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 19:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/?p=86#comment-193</guid>
		<description>Hello
In reply to John

It does scan any and all servers behind the public ip...  Assuming that this is a netscaler / load balancer for multiple web servers.  The Virtual IP assigned represents all of the backend physical ips associated to the individual web sites.  Best bet is to determine the physical ips associated to the Virtual IP that is throwing a positive from the scan.  When that is done you&#039;ll need to find the actual servers that these reside on.  Apply these patches as directed above to those servers.  Make sure you capture / back up the existing entries in the registry as I have seen this cause client issues with non IE browsers.

Good Luck!

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello<br />
In reply to John</p>
<p>It does scan any and all servers behind the public ip&#8230;  Assuming that this is a netscaler / load balancer for multiple web servers.  The Virtual IP assigned represents all of the backend physical ips associated to the individual web sites.  Best bet is to determine the physical ips associated to the Virtual IP that is throwing a positive from the scan.  When that is done you&#8217;ll need to find the actual servers that these reside on.  Apply these patches as directed above to those servers.  Make sure you capture / back up the existing entries in the registry as I have seen this cause client issues with non IE browsers.</p>
<p>Good Luck!</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows / IIS SSL &#8211; Restrict Weak Ciphers by John</title>
		<link>http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/2008/06/21/windows-iis-ssl-restrict-weak-ciphers/comment-page-1/#comment-192</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 23:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/?p=86#comment-192</guid>
		<description>Hello,

I am having the same problems with these ciphers and security metrics.  I have disabled everything lower than 128 and I am still not passing the scan.  Does anyone know if security metrics scans every server and workstation behind our Public IP or is it just the server that is port forwarded?  I have been working on this for almost a month now and the security metrics tech support is of no help at ALL (what a joke), they do not even know what their tests scans!!  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>I am having the same problems with these ciphers and security metrics.  I have disabled everything lower than 128 and I am still not passing the scan.  Does anyone know if security metrics scans every server and workstation behind our Public IP or is it just the server that is port forwarded?  I have been working on this for almost a month now and the security metrics tech support is of no help at ALL (what a joke), they do not even know what their tests scans!!  Any help would be greatly appreciated.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows / IIS SSL &#8211; Restrict Weak Ciphers by clamasters</title>
		<link>http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/2008/06/21/windows-iis-ssl-restrict-weak-ciphers/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>clamasters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/?p=86#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Your mileage may vary.  I have run this on 30 plus servers with zero issues but usually depending on the OS/Browser version of the client viewing the site/application, you may experience issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your mileage may vary.  I have run this on 30 plus servers with zero issues but usually depending on the OS/Browser version of the client viewing the site/application, you may experience issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows / IIS SSL &#8211; Restrict Weak Ciphers by Yong</title>
		<link>http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/2008/06/21/windows-iis-ssl-restrict-weak-ciphers/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Yong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/?p=86#comment-189</guid>
		<description>Any of this alteration affect your application?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any of this alteration affect your application?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows / IIS SSL &#8211; Restrict Weak Ciphers by Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/2008/06/21/windows-iis-ssl-restrict-weak-ciphers/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/?p=86#comment-184</guid>
		<description>Mahalo Nui Loa (Thank you very much in Hawaiian)

Your solution worked great!!!  Really appreciate you publishing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mahalo Nui Loa (Thank you very much in Hawaiian)</p>
<p>Your solution worked great!!!  Really appreciate you publishing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows / IIS SSL &#8211; Restrict Weak Ciphers by Calazan</title>
		<link>http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/2008/06/21/windows-iis-ssl-restrict-weak-ciphers/comment-page-1/#comment-180</link>
		<dc:creator>Calazan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/?p=86#comment-180</guid>
		<description>Thanks! We passed the SecurityMetrics PCI scan by following your instructions.

Pav, for us we disabled the following:
DES 56/56
RC2 40/128
RC4 40/128
RC4 56/128.

And like the others said, SSL 2.0 support should also be disabled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! We passed the SecurityMetrics PCI scan by following your instructions.</p>
<p>Pav, for us we disabled the following:<br />
DES 56/56<br />
RC2 40/128<br />
RC4 40/128<br />
RC4 56/128.</p>
<p>And like the others said, SSL 2.0 support should also be disabled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows / IIS SSL &#8211; Restrict Weak Ciphers by &#187; IIS Security Scan: The remote service supports the use of weak SSL ciphers Calazan.com: Share the Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/2008/06/21/windows-iis-ssl-restrict-weak-ciphers/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; IIS Security Scan: The remote service supports the use of weak SSL ciphers Calazan.com: Share the Knowledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 00:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/?p=86#comment-179</guid>
		<description>[...] goes to this website for this solution: http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/2008/06/21/windows-iis-ssl-restrict-weak-ciphers/  addthis_url = [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] goes to this website for this solution: <a href="http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/2008/06/21/windows-iis-ssl-restrict-weak-ciphers/" rel="nofollow">http://www.curtis-lamasters.com/2008/06/21/windows-iis-ssl-restrict-weak-ciphers/</a>  addthis_url = [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
